<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tech talk &#8211; raster vs. vector, or why has it taken so long to get aerial photos and USGS topos?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gpstracklog.com/2007/12/tech-talk-raste.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gpstracklog.com/2007/12/tech-talk-raste.html</link>
	<description>GPS reviews, news, tips and tricks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 14:29:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: amos</title>
		<link>http://gpstracklog.com/2007/12/tech-talk-raste.html/comment-page-1#comment-2612</link>
		<dc:creator>amos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 06:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://96.30.5.180/~gpstrac/2007/12/tech-talk-raster-vs-vector-or-why-has-it-taken-so-long-to-get-aerial-photos-and-usgs-topos.html#comment-2612</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve used the PN-20 and don&#039;t find the imagery slow when used for its intended purpose: slow speed activities like kayaking, hiking or geocaching.  Indeed as you mention its quite useful, however I do agree that at car speeds its slow and of limited value. (Give me POIs and vectors in the car)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used the PN-20 and don&#8217;t find the imagery slow when used for its intended purpose: slow speed activities like kayaking, hiking or geocaching.  Indeed as you mention its quite useful, however I do agree that at car speeds its slow and of limited value. (Give me POIs and vectors in the car)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

