<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 GPS features you don&#8217;t need</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gpstracklog.com/2008/12/5-gps-features-you-dont-need.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gpstracklog.com/2008/12/5-gps-features-you-dont-need.html</link>
	<description>GPS reviews, news, tips and tricks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:04:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Owings</title>
		<link>http://gpstracklog.com/2008/12/5-gps-features-you-dont-need.html/comment-page-1#comment-142977</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Owings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 13:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://96.30.5.180/~gpstrac/2008/12/5-gps-features-you-dont-need.html#comment-142977</guid>
		<description>I think it has improved, definitely, but is still lacking. In general, the larger the metro (think LA), the better the traffic data.

The newer HD traffic models like the new TomTom LIVEs and the Garmin nuvi 3490LMT appear to improve things more, although the just released 3490LMT seems to have some bugs. I should have my review of the latter posted in a day or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it has improved, definitely, but is still lacking. In general, the larger the metro (think LA), the better the traffic data.</p>
<p>The newer HD traffic models like the new TomTom LIVEs and the Garmin nuvi 3490LMT appear to improve things more, although the just released 3490LMT seems to have some bugs. I should have my review of the latter posted in a day or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa Long</title>
		<link>http://gpstracklog.com/2008/12/5-gps-features-you-dont-need.html/comment-page-1#comment-142824</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 02:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://96.30.5.180/~gpstrac/2008/12/5-gps-features-you-dont-need.html#comment-142824</guid>
		<description>Do you still feel like there is no good way to get accurate traffic reports on a gps unit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you still feel like there is no good way to get accurate traffic reports on a gps unit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Owings</title>
		<link>http://gpstracklog.com/2008/12/5-gps-features-you-dont-need.html/comment-page-1#comment-97827</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Owings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 13:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://96.30.5.180/~gpstrac/2008/12/5-gps-features-you-dont-need.html#comment-97827</guid>
		<description>I know nothing about aviation. Having said that, a handheld unit (vs. one made for autos) will have longer battery life. I&#039;d be sure to get one that uses a USB cable. A good option might be the Garmin eTrex Venture HC. If you can afford it, you might want to consider one of the aviation handhelds at the bottom of this page...

https://buy.garmin.com/shop/shop.do?cID=156</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know nothing about aviation. Having said that, a handheld unit (vs. one made for autos) will have longer battery life. I&#8217;d be sure to get one that uses a USB cable. A good option might be the Garmin eTrex Venture HC. If you can afford it, you might want to consider one of the aviation handhelds at the bottom of this page&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="https://buy.garmin.com/shop/shop.do?cID=156" rel="nofollow">https://buy.garmin.com/shop/shop.do?cID=156</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

