<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tele Atlas and NAVTEQ a duopoly no more</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gpstracklog.com/2009/10/tele-atlas-and-navteq-a-duopoly-no-more.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gpstracklog.com/2009/10/tele-atlas-and-navteq-a-duopoly-no-more.html</link>
	<description>GPS reviews, news, tips and tricks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:51:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Owings</title>
		<link>http://gpstracklog.com/2009/10/tele-atlas-and-navteq-a-duopoly-no-more.html/comment-page-1#comment-26736</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Owings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gpstracklog.com/2009/10/tele-atlas-and-navteq-a-duopoly-no-more.html#comment-26736</guid>
		<description>This is just anecdotal, but it seems like Tele Atlas does have more deficiencies in rural areas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just anecdotal, but it seems like Tele Atlas does have more deficiencies in rural areas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Navigation Enthusiast</title>
		<link>http://gpstracklog.com/2009/10/tele-atlas-and-navteq-a-duopoly-no-more.html/comment-page-1#comment-26619</link>
		<dc:creator>Navigation Enthusiast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gpstracklog.com/2009/10/tele-atlas-and-navteq-a-duopoly-no-more.html#comment-26619</guid>
		<description>May be the best prevail. Many of you know NAVTEQ is here for long time and known for their quality data and they are poineers. Just like what Google is for their search capability and Apple is for their consumer driven innovation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May be the best prevail. Many of you know NAVTEQ is here for long time and known for their quality data and they are poineers. Just like what Google is for their search capability and Apple is for their consumer driven innovation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty</title>
		<link>http://gpstracklog.com/2009/10/tele-atlas-and-navteq-a-duopoly-no-more.html/comment-page-1#comment-26608</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gpstracklog.com/2009/10/tele-atlas-and-navteq-a-duopoly-no-more.html#comment-26608</guid>
		<description>I always found the Tele Atlas maps of inferior accuracy compared to the previously-used NAVTEQ maps.  One error was bad enough that the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory poked fun at how Google Maps/Tele Atlas showed the facility 18mi away from its actual location (scroll to bottom of link below).

http://www.fnal.gov/pub/today/april_fools_2009.html

Google&#039;s new maps are a mixed bag from what I&#039;ve seen in my area (Chicago).  My street has the wrong name (same error as in TIGER data), and a conference center is shown as a college that closed 40 years ago.  Both errors were reported using Google&#039;s handy-dandy error reporting tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always found the Tele Atlas maps of inferior accuracy compared to the previously-used NAVTEQ maps.  One error was bad enough that the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory poked fun at how Google Maps/Tele Atlas showed the facility 18mi away from its actual location (scroll to bottom of link below).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fnal.gov/pub/today/april_fools_2009.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.fnal.gov/pub/today/april_fools_2009.html</a></p>
<p>Google&#8217;s new maps are a mixed bag from what I&#8217;ve seen in my area (Chicago).  My street has the wrong name (same error as in TIGER data), and a conference center is shown as a college that closed 40 years ago.  Both errors were reported using Google&#8217;s handy-dandy error reporting tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

