<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Garmin Oregon 550</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gpstracklog.com/2010/01/garmin-oregon-550-review.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gpstracklog.com/2010/01/garmin-oregon-550-review.html</link>
	<description>GPS reviews, news, tips and tricks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 18:40:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Owings</title>
		<link>http://gpstracklog.com/2010/01/garmin-oregon-550-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-150988</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Owings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 14:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gpstracklog.com/?p=3683#comment-150988</guid>
		<description>Great unit. You sacrifice a bit in screen size, but make up for it with visibility. I find myself reaching for the 62s over my other choices. Partially that&#039;s because I have BirdsEye Topo on it, but I do like the buttons and form factor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great unit. You sacrifice a bit in screen size, but make up for it with visibility. I find myself reaching for the 62s over my other choices. Partially that&#8217;s because I have BirdsEye Topo on it, but I do like the buttons and form factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garry</title>
		<link>http://gpstracklog.com/2010/01/garmin-oregon-550-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-150965</link>
		<dc:creator>Garry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 06:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gpstracklog.com/?p=3683#comment-150965</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much for the quick reply. I hadn&#039;t considered the 62 series, and when I think about it, for the type of application I&#039;m mainly interested in, buttons, rather than a touch screen, makes a lot more sense. The 450/550 may have higher resolution, but it seems that could frequently be negated in bright conditions, so again, the 62sc seems more suited to my purpose.

So, you&#039;ve persuaded me to go for the 62sc - order placed, and eagerly awaiting it&#039;s arrival. Will let you know how I get on with it.

Thanks for a great website, and great feedback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much for the quick reply. I hadn&#8217;t considered the 62 series, and when I think about it, for the type of application I&#8217;m mainly interested in, buttons, rather than a touch screen, makes a lot more sense. The 450/550 may have higher resolution, but it seems that could frequently be negated in bright conditions, so again, the 62sc seems more suited to my purpose.</p>
<p>So, you&#8217;ve persuaded me to go for the 62sc &#8211; order placed, and eagerly awaiting it&#8217;s arrival. Will let you know how I get on with it.</p>
<p>Thanks for a great website, and great feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Owings</title>
		<link>http://gpstracklog.com/2010/01/garmin-oregon-550-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-150926</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Owings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 14:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gpstracklog.com/?p=3683#comment-150926</guid>
		<description>The 550 would be good for mountain biking, but I actually prefer the 62s with buttons. That way I can switch screens without looking at it. The 62sc has a camera, BTW.

I don&#039;t think you&#039;ll get any beter trail maps by buying a &quot;t&quot; model. The best thing to do is download specific trails you are going to travel from a .gpx sharing site like Garmin Connect.

I like the standard Garmin bike mount; it&#039;s got a  lower profile than the RAMs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 550 would be good for mountain biking, but I actually prefer the 62s with buttons. That way I can switch screens without looking at it. The 62sc has a camera, BTW.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;ll get any beter trail maps by buying a &#8220;t&#8221; model. The best thing to do is download specific trails you are going to travel from a .gpx sharing site like Garmin Connect.</p>
<p>I like the standard Garmin bike mount; it&#8217;s got a  lower profile than the RAMs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

