Garmin Dakota 20 review

Hands on with the Garmin Dakota 20
The Garmin Dakota 20 is a smaller version of Garmin’s successful Oregon models. It appears poised to replace the eTrex series, bringing all of the Oregon’s touch screen goodness while retaining the eTrex’s small form factor, light weight and long battery life.
Both units in the two-model Dakota series sport a 2.6” screen. On the Dakota 20, you get a tri-axial electronic compass, barometric altimeter, wireless data transfer between units and the ability to accept a micro-SD card, all features lacking on the Dakota 10. Neither model comes with pre-loaded topo maps.
EDIT: The Dakota 20 also supports Garmin’s new BirdsEye aerial imagery.
Comparing to the Oregon series
Before we get into the details, let’s compare the Dakota to the Oregon series. The Dakota units have (theoretically) longer battery life and weigh less (5.25 oz. vs. 6.8 oz.), while the Oregons have a larger screen (3.0”) and add 3D views, Wherigo support, a photo viewer, and NMEA / Spanner support.
To see how the Dakota 20 stands up against other Garmin models, check out my Garmin handheld GPS comparison chart.
The image below (Dakota, left; Oregon, right) compares how screen size affects the area you can see covered in terms of map display. 
The other difference worth mentioning is screen visibility…
Touchscreen display
While the Oregon has a brighter backlight, the Dakota is a bit more visible under daylight and outdoors conditions. All of the newer generation high-resolution GPS screens suffer a bit when it comes to visibility, but it seems like Garmin is making some progress in this arena. I do a fair bit of mountain biking, and the Dakota is the first hi-res touch screen unit I consider suitable for fixed mount, non-powered use (e.g., bike handlebars). Visibility isn’t a big deal when you carry one of these units in your hand, as you’ll intuitively tilt it for the best view without thought. Nor is it an issue when powered with a car adapter, etc. But after being disappointed with previous touch screen models, I was pleased to see how readable the display was on my bike’s handlebars, even when wearing tinted glasses.
Visibility was good in direct, full sunlight (there were points where it was as bright as my 60CSx in full sun). It looked great in dark shade too. The Dakota screen’s performance was weakest at points in between – light shade or indirect light.
A couple more comments on visibility – my testing was done with the backlight on; I expect this is how most people will use it. I kept it set to time out at two minutes. The other point is that maps can dramatically affect visibility. Garmin’s Topo US 2008 is beautiful, but the green background in national forest and park areas makes it much less legible (see below at left). The free 1:24,000 scale topo maps available from GPS File Depot (example below at right) generally do not have this, and they can improve visibility significantly in marginal lighting.
This is a bit off-topic, but it sure would be nice to have a low profile handlebar mount that would allow you to adjust the angle, in two planes, on the fly.
Before leaving the subject, I’ll add that I recommend using a screen protector for handheld touchscreen GPS receivers.
Garmin Dakota 20 interface
The interface is basically the same as that of the Garmin Oregon, with a main menu of 24 items spread across four screens (see below). It’s pretty intuitive and easy to use, but it gets much better if you take the time to customize it. Here are some tips:
Use profiles – There is a “Change profiles” item on the main menu, and you can create a new one via Setup > Profiles. Tap the new profile to give it a name. Now start changing various preferences. Want track up when geocaching and north up when biking? No problem. The possibilities are nearly endless.- Rearrange the main menu – Set this different for each profile. I make extensive use of the Track Manager, so that gets moved to the first main menu screen for my hiking and biking profiles.
- Create sun and shade profiles – A great use of this tool is to create a sun profile (perhaps even one for each activity). Create this profile and then go to Setup > Maps > Advanced Map Setup. Set Shaded Relief to Do Not Show to enhance visibility in bright light. Credit GPS Fix with originating this tip. EDIT: Another great tip from Scott (GPS Fix) is to “go to Setup>Map>Advanced Map Setup>Zoom Levels>Land Cover and turn it off you shouldn’t see the green background any longer.”
The keypad is a little more cramped on the Dakota than the Oregon, due to the smaller screen, but I found that I quickly got used to this and it did not result in a significant increase in errors.
Shown below are the compass and trip computer screens. The data fields can, of course, be customized, as can the background color. The trip computer screen can be also switched to show fewer (but larger) fields.

Finally, here’s a random interface tip… When you select a location on the map, a push pin appears. You can now slide the map around underneath the pin, and zoom in as needed, to fine tune the selected location..
Route, Track and Waypoint management
The Dakota 20 has the same excellent route, track and waypoint management tools found on the Oregon series. These include:
- Waypoints – The ability to project a waypoint, and to reposition one at your current location.
- Tracks – You can choose to hide or show a track on the map and give it a custom color (17 colors are available). The image at the right shows the View Track preview option.
- Routes – You can view a map of the entire route, edit the route, reverse it and view an elevation plot.
Dakota 20 tri-axial compass
Having a tri-axial compass means you don’t have to hold the unit level while navigating. Here’s a quick video showing the calibration process:
Geocaching with the Dakota 20
The Dakota is set up for full paperless geocaching support, meaning you can see the description, logs, and hint, and you can log your attempt (find, DNF, etc.) for later transfer back to geocaching.com. Speaking of which, full access to these features requires a premium membership at geocaching.com. Shown below, clockwise from top left: Closest geocaches, geocache description, menu for a specific cache, and preview map.



Wireless data transfer
The Dakota 20 is capable of wireless data transfer with other compatible Garmin units. You can transfer waypoints, tracks, routes and geocache summaries (paperless caching details cannot be transferred).
Free maps and custom maps
One of the nice things about the Dakota are two types of free maps for them….
GPS File Depot, mentioned earlier, has 1:24,000 scale topo maps posted for most of the US. I included a screen shot for one of these above in the touchscreen display section of this review.
Also of note, is the new ability to create and load custom raster maps to Garmin Colorado, Dakota and Oregon units, using their latest beta firmware.
GPS receiver and battery performance
Battery life was tested using fully charged 2,000 mAh Eneloop NiMH rechargeable batteries. Results ranged from 16 to 16.75 hours, without backlight use, under light canopy. Interestingly enough, the longer figure was achieved using the Alkaline battery type setting. I’m not sure this is any better than my Oregon 400t, which is only rated for 16 hours vs 20 hours for the Dakota. Perhaps this will be improved in a future firmware release.
Satellite lock was achieved in 14 seconds, with testing done under no canopy.
In tests for accuracy, the Dakota 20 performed very well. A sample comparison is shown below, matching it up against the Garmin 60CSx. Track point collection was set for five second intervals on both devices. This test took place under fairly dense canopy.
Since it’s very difficult to see the relevant details in such a small image, I’m providing links below where you can download the .gpx or .gdb (MapSource) files below. The 60CSx is in yellow and the Dakota track is red. While the Dakota went wide at one point by about 140 feet, the 60CSx exhibited much more “spidering” during stops, wandering around 240 feet at one point. Maybe my 60CSx is showing signs of age, but regardless of the comparison, I was quite impressed with the Dakota’s performance.
The track files are available at:
Garmin Dakota 20 pros
- Compact and light weight
- Tri-axial compass
- Barometric altimeter
- Great touch screen interface
- Slightly better sunlight visibility than Oregon series
- Ability to customize display and menus using profiles
- Excellent track management tools
- Paperless geocaching support
- Availability of free maps
- Accepts Garmin custom raster maps with v 3.22 beta
- Good battery life
Garmin Dakota 20 cons
- Much poorer sunlight visibility than eTrex and GPSMAP color units
- Small screen limits map area that can be seen
Recommendation
Highly recommended. The Dakota 20 is the first touch screen unit I’ve found suitable for fixed-mount, non-powered use (e.g., mountain bikes). It will also appeal to those looking to economize, or folks desiring a lightweight or more compact unit than the Oregon series. The Dakota is a great choice for hikers, bikers, geocachers and just about any other category of handheld users.
More Garmin Dakota 20 reviews
- Consumer-authored Garmin Dakota 20 reviews
have been posted at Amazon
- About.com gives a 4 out of 5 star rating in their Garmin Dakota 20 review
- A first impressions review of the Garmin Dakota 20
- Comparing the Garmin Dakota 20 to the DeLorme PN-40
- The Search Jaunt offers a brief review of the Dakota 20
- Testing the Dakota 20 on the ski slopes
- GPSInformation.org has posted a thorough Garmin Dakota 20 review
- BikeRadar gives a 3-1/2 out of 5 star rating in their Dakota 20 review
- RickRukes007 has posted a four part video review of the Garmin Dakota 20
- A Garmin Dakota 20 review on the Great Wall forum
- A Dakota 20 review from the creator of TopoFusion.com
- Lets Go Mobile has posted their own review of the Dakota 20
- Geocacher reviews of the Garmin Dakota 20
- A Garmin Dakota 20 review from a Laplander
I’ll be posting more hands on GPS reviews as they appear, but in the meantime, here are some…
Other Garmin Dakota 20 resources
- The Garmin Dakota 20 owners manual, in the language of your choice
- Compare the Dakota 20 to other Garmin mapping units
- This Garmin Dakota wiki includes a message forum
- An interactive Garmin Dakota demo page
- The official Garmin Dakota 20 web page
- Garmin Dakota training videos
Compare prices on the Garmin Dakota 20 at these merchants:
- Check the current Garmin Dakota 20
price at Amazon
- Find the Garmin Dakota 20 at GPS City, one of our favorite low cost vendors
- Check out the deal on the Garmin Dakota 20 GPS
at REI.com, where satisfaction is guaranteed and members get 10% back on eligible purchases
- Buy the Dakota® 20
direct from Garmin
- Find the Garmin Dakota 20 Touch-Screen Handheld GPS Receiver
at TigerGPS, where you get free shipping on orders above $250
- Get the Garmin Dakota 20
for an amazing price on eBay
| Store | Rating | Best Prices |
|---|---|---|
Compare all prices on the Garmin Dakota 20 Handheld / Trail GPS ranging from $219.95 to $599.99. | ||
![]() | ![]() In stock at Sonic Electronix | $309.99 |
![]() | ![]() | $337.95 |
![]() | ![]() In stock at Target.com | $329.99 |
![]() | ![]() In stock at iSave.com | $219.95 |
![]() | ![]() In stock at TheNerds.net | $238.99 |
powered by ![]() | ||















The easiest way to do this, if it’s just a few, is to convert them to tracks. You can do that with just about any brand of GPS.
For larger boundary files, I’d suggest getting a Garmin and creating a transparent overlay. There are a couple of methods described in these threads:
http://forums.groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?showtopic=218965
http://forums.groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?showtopic=211363
Hope that helps. Feel free to follow up with more questions.
Great review. Based upon your recommendation, I bought this unit and I’ve been comparing it with my GPSMap60scx. The 60scx always gives the accuracy as +/- feet while the Dakota just states an a number without the plus and minus–is the Dakota doing the math for you? For example, I just connected outside and the 60scx gave me +/- 9 ft and the Dakota reported 18 ft. Are they reporting the same level or accuracy? Or is the Dakota less assured of its location? I hope that makes sense! Thanks!
I don’t “think” they are reporting the same level of accuracy. But they may be using different algorithms to calculate accuracy, which is merely an estimate. Not sure that really helps you though!
Probably the best way to test them is to compare tracklogs. It’s also nice to compare to previous tracklogs if there is an area you have frequented with lots of historical data. For new comparisons, I’d go in and set the tracklog recording interval to manual, and use identical settings. Also, make sure WAAS settings are either on or off for both units. The units should be in a comparable position and not close to each other — one in each hand works well, but is tiring and hard to pull off. Unless you don’t need you hands for anything else!
How do you like the Dakota otherwise?
After reading this I purchased a Dakota 20 at REI. I could have got it cheaper but I’m glad I got it there because I could take it back! There are huge problems with the Dakota for me personally. One: the screen is very difficult to see in many situations (yeah, I know it’s fine in bright daylight but in a car or in a boat it’s quite poor). Two: the way the menus work drove me batty! Just to change the way the map is displayed you have to exit from the map, work your way to the setting you want to adjust, then work your way back to the map again – lots of pushes on a really bad touch screen! I’m surprised none of the reviews mentioned this. Chris at my local REI mentioned this, said he preferred the eTrex Vista HCx. Should have listened to him, would have saved me some time/effort (and $100!). After two days of giving the Dakota a serious workout, I returned it and got the Vista HCx. I am SO much happier with it! And, and least with these two samples, the Vista is much faster at initializing and re-acquiring satellites.
Obviously YMWV, but at least try the Dakota before you shell out money for it. I think it’s a nice beginning but it needs more development…
W
Thanks William. I think Garmin is trying to address the menu issue with the new 62 / 78 series. Hey, I’m curious, did you have it hooked into external power in your car and/or boat?
Rich, thank you for the review (and GPS Mapper). I used batteries for all my tests so far, both alkaline and nimh. On the boat I’ll use external power.
http://www.astronomicaltours.net/2010/Yacht/aboard.html
We are nearing retirement and enjoy casual geocaching but need to purchase a new GPS. I’m considering the Dakota 20 or the Oregon 450 for paperless geocaching and touchscreen. Does the difference in display size make the Oregon a better choice for older eyes and fingers? Any other thoughts for us?
I think so. I’m also seeing a few reports indicating that the Dakota units aren’t as sturdy as the Oregons. I’d go with the 450. Hope that helps!
Great review! I was wondering if it’s possible to have an external power supply for the dakota and also Etrex vista. I am a biker and I want to hook it up to the power supply of my hub dynamo, juust wondering if it would work, and if it works with usb or with ac/dc.
Any USB connection will put it into mass storage, since the Dakota has no Spanner mode. I think this is the only external power option…
https://buy.garmin.com/shop/shop.do?pID=15429
I’m not sure if you can convert it or not.
Thanks for the comprehensive review, Rich. I’ve been thinking about getting a dakota 20 gps, and this will help me a lot in making my final decision. It’s nice to have someone out there that can compare these for us!
Glad to help!
Hey Rich,
Like your site. Based on your advice, I’ve just upgraded from an aging Geko 201 to the Dakota 20. So thanks for the sensible and balanced review. My only concern was using the touchscreen in cold weather, but several posters at geocaching.com have assured they’ve had no problems.
I do have two questions for you:
1. Is it possible to transfer geocache files to the Dakota and have them recognised as geocaches (i.e., under the geocache window) WITHOUT a premium membership at geocaching? Currently, I can transfer them to the GPX directory, but they only show as waypoints. (The other complication is that I use a Mac.)
2. What do profiles do, exactly? Under “Setup” I can create, delete, rename, or move profiles, but I have no insight as to what setting a given profile actually does. Any ideas?
1. I don’t know of any way. You should try out the 30 day free membership that comes with buying the Dakota though. If there’s enough caches around you, you could use OpenCaching.com, which is free.
2. Profiles allow you to store settings. For example, you could have a profile for geocaching that uses the geocaching dashboard, and one for hiking that doesn’t. Sun/shade profiles are popular. As are profiles for different types of maps and aerial imagery. See the section above on the Dakota 20 interface for more info.
Thanks, Rich.
Don’t think I got the 30 day offer (I’m in Canada). I’ll look at opencaching too.
So to set up profiles: I select a profile, then go back to the map or compass or trip computer page (or whatever), make the changes I want, and the Dakota will remember them?
Exactly. Even though it’s geared for the Oregon series, this should help…
http://garminoregon.wikispaces.com/Profiles
Also, try this…
http://www.geocaching.com/garmin/freetrial.aspx
Does this have voice navigation? Curious… If it’s just the beep that would suck, thinking maybe this one GPS to rule them all for what I need (Bicycle, Jeep, Roads)
No, it doesn’t. The Montana does (with the right mount and City Navigator), but it’s a pricey solution…
http://gpstracklog.com/2011/08/garmin-montana-first-looks.html
Not long ago Dad got a Dakota 20 & put an Oregon Topo map on it from BaseCamp. We also went to Geocaching.com, downloaded the latest communicator plug~in & even downloaded some caches on the device. Recently we tried to put Oregon & Idaho Topos on it from BaseCamp & we even did the updater it wanted us to do, but now for some reason BaseCamp won’t hardly recognize the unit. Then when it finally does it builds the maps but then won’t send them to the unit. Then BaseCamp & the computer goes to “not responding,” & everything shuts down. To top it off now Geocaching.com says “No Device Found.” The Dakota still works when not plugged into the computer. For Dad’s sanity & mine, we beg you for any advice on what is going on with this thing?
Thanks, Sis Ban
Does the device show up in mass storage mode? If so, and it’s the topo maps causing a problem, you could go in and remove the gmapsupp.img file. Or if the maps were put on a microSD card, just pull the card and see if that fixes it.
Also, can you tell us what firmware version it is running?
Those are the places I would start. You might also check BaseCamp for updates.
Hey, I’m glad you mentioned to check the SD card. Either taking out the card & putting it back in or ~ (I think) it seems “Dad” didn’t have the card “clicked” in all the way. We are back in business. We are so thankful for you takin’ care of idiots like us ~ YOU ROCK! By the way…when you asked “what firmware version it is running?” Did you mean the brand of SD card or what? Like I said we’re idiots! I will say in the meantime Dad had already got a hold of Garmin ~ on the phone even ~ & they were willing to fix it or replace it! Another reason we love Garmin!
Thanks again for your time,
Sis Ban
Excellent. Firmware = software in this case. I was just wondering what software version the Dakota was running, but no need to know since it’s working.
On my Oregon you find it by going to Setup > About (scroll all the way to the bottom).