
Hands on with the Garmin GPSMAP 62s
It’s finally here… The Garmin GPSMAP 62s brings a long-awaited update to the fabled and much-loved GPSMAP 60CSx, which has reigned supreme as the gold standard handheld GPS for more than four years. During that time, Garmin experimented with new interfaces, first with the Colorado series, and later with the Oregon and Dakota lines. These have been fine-tuned through many software updates, adding things like paperless geocaching and
the ability to add custom maps and aerial imagery.
With the 62 series (and the boater friendly companion 78 series, which shares the same interface), Garmin has married the best features of the 60/76 models, with many of the advantages of the Oregon line.
The problematic high-resolution screens found on the Colorado and Oregon lines did not make it to the 62 series (although I should note that this problem has largely been solved in the latest model, the Oregon 450). Before we get into the details, lets look at some closely…
Related models
- Drop down a notch to the GPSMAP 62 and you’ll lose wireless data sharing, the barometric altimeter, tri-axial electronic compass and the micro-SD slot; still, this one has enough internal memory to satisfy most people’s needs
- Going the other direction, the GPSMAP 62st adds pre-loaded 1:100,000 scale US topo maps to the features found on the 62s, but with all the free maps available, there’s little reason to bump up to this model
- To see how the GPSMAP 62s stands up against other Garmin models, check out my Garmin handheld GPS comparison chart
I’ll discuss the display and feature set first, then look at performance
Portions of the following were adapted from my review of the previously released Garmin GPSMAP 78s and other units with shared features.
Garmin GPSMAP 62s display
With transflective TFT screens, the greater the pixel density, the less light that can be reflected back to the user. In order to maintain the bright screen found on the 60/76 series, Garmin left the resolution (160 x 240 pixels) alone. Screen size remains unchanged too, at 1.6 x 2.2”. The 62 and 78 series do enjoy an increased range of colors that can be displayed (65,000 vs. 256 in the 60/76 series). The result is a bright display, not quite as large or as high resolution as the Oregon series, but with much better visibility in a wide range of conditions. I definitely noticed the lower resolution, but these are the tradeoffs you make. The only time the screen seems cramped to me is when I have a dashboard showing on the map screen (discussed more below).

Shown above is a photo taken in full sun, without backlight, comparing the 60CSX and 62s. It is difficult to capture screen visibility on film, but I find these two displays comparable in a wide range of conditions.
Garmin GPSMAP 62s interface
Garmin hit a home run on the interface. They did an excellent job taking the best aspects of the Oregon series and making it work on a non-touchscreen unit. I think it is actually better than the Oregon except for when it comes to text-entry, where the touchscreen excels. The 62/78 series interface makes it much quicker to navigate main menu items.
A Page Ribbon menu appears when you press the Page or Quit buttons (see image at right). Just like on the 60/76 series, these buttons advance through pages in forward or reverse order, respectively.
The Page Ribbon menu item that appears is the next screen in the sequence. After a second or two, that screen will automatically open. Or you can press Enter to go there right away, or continue pressing Page or Quit to advance to other pages in the sequence; stop on one and it will open. Page Ribbon items and their order can be customized. I prefer this interface to the old style, but you may not. In that case, you can set the unit to a classic style menu and get the old 60/76 series functionality, eliminating the Page Ribbon.
Here’s a quick video I shot, showing a bit of the interface:
Newer features on the Garmin GPSMAP 62s
The 62 series inherited a number of features from the Colorado, Dakota and/or Oregon series. These include the ability to utilize Garmin custom maps and BirdsEye aerial imagery, a tri-axial compass, new customization options, advanced track navigation, wireless data transfer and paperless geocaching. None of these were available on the 60/76 series; I’ll explore each in more detail.
Custom maps and BirdsEye imagery
Garmin custom maps allows you to put just about any map image on the 62s. Found a PDF park trail map online? Add it to your GPS! The image at left below shows a custom map — a USGS topo (raster) image. You can read more about this feature by checking out my posts on Garmin custom maps.
With Garmin’s BirdsEye aerial imagery program, a $29.99 annual subscription allows you to add aerial imagery to the GPSMAP 62s. Since I don’t yet have a BirdsEye subscription for my unit, I’m showing a Jefferson Memorial aerial image using Garmin custom maps, but hey, you get the idea.

Tri-axial compass
Having a tri-axial compass means you don’t have to hold the unit level while navigating. The downside is that the calibration process is more complicated than that for a two-axis electronic compass. It’s the same procedure that is used on the Dakota 20 and Oregon x50 series — here’s a brief video I shot of it. The compass should be recalibrated every time you change the batteries in the unit.
Customizing the Garmin GPSMAP 62s
The 62s offers lots of options for customization. I highly recommend you take the time to set up the following.
Page sequence – You can customize the page sequence by choosing Main Menu > Setup > Page Sequence. This will allow you to select which pages appear in the page sequence and their order. The Page and Quit buttons move forward and backwards (respectively) through pages. I usually put the map screen as my first page and the trip computer last; this way I can toggle between them with the page and quit buttons.
Profiles – The 62s comes with recreational, geocaching, automotive, marine, fitness and classic profiles. You can switch profiles by going to Main Menu > Profile Change. Or create a new one by going to Main Menu > Setup > Profiles. Select the new profile to give it a name. Any changes you make in menus or other settings will be retained in that profile. So start changing things! Want track up when geocaching and north up when biking? No problem. How about a separate profile that just shows USGS topos or aerial imagery? The possibilities are nearly endless.
Data fields – You can change data fields on just about any screen that has these; simply press Menu > Change Data Fields.
Dashboards – Instead of data fields (and in some cases in addition to), you can select a dashboard for the map, compass and trip computer screens. Choices (depending upon page) may include automotive, stopwatch, small or large data field, recreational, compass, geocaching or elevation plot. I’ve included screenshots showing the last four below. For the trip computer and compass pages, you access this via Menu > Change Dashboard. For the map screen, choose Menu > Setup Map > Data Fields > Dashboard. The one downside here is the small screen on the 62 series; using a dashboard can significantly reduce map real estate.


Track navigation
With the GPSMAP 62s, you can select a track to navigate and a route will be created. Waypoints are automatically generated for major high and low elevation points, and start and finish; these and any user waypoints along the track are added to the route. I’m a heavy user of track navigation. If I head out for a trail I’ve never traveled before, I do a search online for tracks (favorite search terms are .gpx, gps, trail name, and park name) and load the track to the device. One advantage of this new track navigation feature is that, unlike typical backcountry route navigation, you’ll get an estimate of actual trail distance rather than “as the crow flies” mileage. Screenshot at right.
Paperless Geocaching
The 62 series is set up for full paperless geocaching support, meaning you can see the description, logs, and hint, and you can log your attempt (find, DNF, etc.) for later transfer back to geocaching.com. Speaking of which, full access to these features requires a premium membership at geocaching.com. Shown below, clockwise from top left: closest geocaches, geocache description, map with geocaching dashboard, recent logs.

Wireless data transfer
The GPSMAP 62s is capable of wireless data transfer with other compatible Garmin units. You can transfer waypoints, tracks, routes and paperless geocache details.
Other features of note
Most of the following aren’t that new, but they are worth mentioning anyway:
Route, Track and Waypoint management 
The GPSMAP 62 series has excellent route, track and waypoint management tools, including:
- Waypoints – The ability to project a waypoint, average location, set proximity alerts, and to reposition a waypoint at your current location.
- Tracks – You can choose to hide or show multiple tracks on the map, view an elevation plot, and give them a custom color (17 colors are available). The image at the right shows a track in red (a record of a previous trip). The color of the active track may also be changed. There’s a good thread at the GPSMAP wiki that delves more into track archiving and storage. The 2.44 beta firmware update brought additional archiving improvements; hopefully this will make it to a non-beta release soon.
- Routes – You can view a map of the entire route, edit the route, reverse it and view an elevation plot.
Ability to utilize free maps
One of the most awesome things about Garmin mapping units is the huge number of free maps available. My favorite site for these is http://gpsfiledepot.com where you can find 1:24,000 scale vector topo maps for most states. You can see a sample in the bottom two screen shots below. If you want shaded relief though (shown in the first two shots), you’ll need to go with Garmin’s own product, either Topo US 100K or their new 1:24,000 scale series.

Auto use
While I would prefer the Oregon 450 as a dual use unit, due to its touch screen (which is significantly larger too), the 62 series is capable of giving turn-by-turn directions when loaded with City Navigator maps.
Under the flap and inside
Under the protective weather cap is a mini-USB port and MCX external antenna connection. Just so it doesn’t trigger questions, I’ll mention that the item beside the antenna connection is a screw. Inside the battery compartment is a micro-SD slot for additional map and data storage.

One hardware note here. The battery holders can be very tight with rechargeable NiMH batteries. I actually had to pry the batteries out of one unit I tested, though my wife could remove them with her amazingly strong fingernails! The batteries popped out of the other test units with a good slap, and I expect that even tight ones will loosen up over time.
Carabiner and mounting system
A rail mount on the back of the unit allows the included carabiner to slide onto the device (shown below). This is the same system used on the Colorado, Dakota and Oregon lines so the related accessories are interchangeable. I’ve heard some people say they don’t trust the carabiner mount, but after using it on my Oregon for a couple of years, I can say that I’ve never had any problems with it. Personally, I really like it and find it very convenient for clipping onto my pack.

Garmin’s bike mount uses the same system, as shown below. I didn’t like this at first, since it’s just a zip tie system, but after a reader suggested using pliers (to pull the zip tie tight) and a screw driver (to press against the base of the zip tie slot), I’ve found that I can get it quite tight. I’ve never had a unit pop off the mount, though it is possible to slide it on incorrectly, so be aware of that. Also, low profile mounts such as this one seem much safer to the rider, in case of a crash, than ones that protrude.

Auto mount kits that utilize this rail mount connection are also available.
Garmin GPSMAP 62s performance
UPDATE: The issues discussed below seem to have been resolved, and I am now very happy with my own 62s.
A tale of three units
I requested a GPSMAP 62s from Garmin and immediately put it on my mountain bike and went out for a test run. I was pretty shocked at the tracklog errors I saw. The unit also exhibited some abnormal behaviors just sitting still under open sky, with a lot of cycling between low and high readings. I talked to Garmin support, tried a hard reset – everything I could think of, but still saw these problems. At this point, I assumed I had a defective unit and arranged for them to send me a replacement…
Unit # 2 was better, but I still saw high accuracy readings (80’+) and some tracklog errors when mountain biking. I was seeing no such problems reported in GPS forums, so what was going on? Unlike the first one, the second unit appeared to be a pre-production model, further muddying the waters. I was beginning to feel pretty unlucky. Had I really received two dogs in a row? The sister unit, the GPSMAP 78s, had been so good. What in the world was going on?
Third unit and a theory
So I decided I needed another unit to test and, suspecting that Garmin might take a dim view of sending me a third unit, I went down to REI and plunked down my own money’; I figured I’d end up buying one anyway. When it gave me less than stellar results, a theory started forming in my oh too slow gray matter.
I never tested the 78s on my bike, because it didn’t work with standard mounts. Could it be that these new models had problems under canopy, at speed? While I was seeing wide swings in accuracy readings, the tracklogs looked pretty good except on downhill runs. After a couple of weeks of struggle, I had a theory to test. So lets break down performance by use and environment:
Mountain biking (speed + canopy)
Notes on methodology – Tracks were set up to record points every five seconds, WAAS was enabled. The 62s and my 60CSX were both mounted on opposite sides of my handlebars, in a position closer to horizontal than vertical.
The image below shows a portion of the 62s tracklog from a representative out and back trip. On the downhill run there are numerous places where the track doesn’t match well with what was recorded on the way up. In one place the error approaches 250’.
Compare this to the same section of 60CSx track below, where track separation maxes out at around 65’.
However, the 60CSx exhibited much worse spidering / scattering at rest stops, up to 150’ at one point, shown below (60CSx in blue, 62s in yellow).

Enter the beta
In my final round of tests before posting this review, I installed the 2.44 beta firmware, which also updated the GPS firmware to version 4.52. You can see in the 62s track below that these wild errors appear to be gone. I did see track separations of up to 110’ on the uphill and downhill runs, but nothing as large as the previous errors.

On the same ride, the 60CSx also showed track separation errors of around 110’, and once again exhibited significant spidering/multipath errors when stopped.
It appears that the 2.44 beta has significantly improved performance for mountain bikers and others who use their GPS receivers under canopy at faster than walking speeds. Except where indicated, the remainder of the tests discussed below were made using non-beta software.
Hiking under canopy
Here I used the same methodology I did when testing the 78s:
Recordings were made out and back, on foot, with the 78s in my right hand, and the 60CSx in my left. This meant that one unit may have been closer to a cut slope on the trip up, but the other unit was in this position on the trip down.
Tests were made in multiple locations. Basically, I saw more instances of tracklog separation with the 62s; these were in the 35-50’ range. I saw less of these with the 60CSX, but it threw larger variances, up to about 80’. And again, the 60CSx exhibited much more “spidering” when stopped.
Speed or canopy?
So going fast under canopy was problematic in my early testing, but going slow under canopy wasn’t so bad. How about speed alone? To test this, I stuck both units on my car’s dashboard and recorded tracks while driving. Both performed very well, though the 62s went off by about 70’ at one point. The issue appeared to be more about the combination of speed and leaf canopy, than about either alone, but again, it looks like the recent beta has largely fixed this.
Geocaching performance
I did some geocaching testing, but it is much harder to draw a conclusion here. Generally, the 62s put me a little closer and tended to settle down significantly faster than the 60CSx. One time, when standing 3 feet from a cache, it showed me 2’ away, with the compass pointing almost directly to the cache. Impressive! But alas, I am at the whims of the accuracy of the published coordinates when geocaching.
Battery life
I tested battery life using freshly charged Sanyo Eneloop batteries with the backlight off, and left it sitting under light canopy, undisturbed until the unit shut down. The unit was set to collect trackpoints every 30 seconds. The tracklog and total time data field showed that the unit ran for 17 hours and 59 minutes, a couple hours shy of the rated battery life of up to 20 hours.
Altimeter
In my most recent tests, with the 2.40 and 2.44 firmware, I found total ascent readings to be very accurate, on par with the 60CSx, which has always been my most reliable indicator of elevation gain. I was pleased to see this, since the Oregon series has bounced back and forth between accurate and inaccurate readings, depending upon firmware version.
Creaks and bugs
There have been a lot of reports on message boards about units that creak when pressed on opposite sides of the case. I have seen, um, heard this on each of the three units I tested. On the first, you could hear it when powering the unit of and off. It wasn’t as bad on the other two I tested. Whether this portends other problems over the life of the unit is unknown.
With new handhelds, you can typically expect some bugs in the early firmware. The 62s certainly has these, but many are minor or esoteric. One of the more common and unresolved complaints I’ve heard is that the reported battery level stays on full, and then drops to 3/4 charge shortly before the battery dies. Until this is fixed, when the battery level shows any drop, it’s nearly time to change to a new set!
Garmin GPSMAP 62s tips
I imagine there are more, but here’s a few tips:
- Use the zoom buttons to jump a full page in a menu
- When entering a name, the zoom buttons will switch between keypads
- You can create a custom startup message (e.g., if found, please call…) by connecting it to your computer and editing the Garmin/startup.txt file
- The 60 series header showing battery status is gone; you can check the 62 series battery level by briefly pressing the power button, but you may also want to dedicate a data field to it.
Garmin GPSMAP 62 pros
- Excellent menu system; fast access to features
- Bright screen
- Ability to load Garmin custom maps and BirdsEye aerial imagery
- Paperless geocaching
- Tri-axial compass
- Extensive customization options
- Advanced track navigation
- Wireless data transfer with compatible units
- Accurate total ascent readings
- Generally accurate tracklogs, especially with latest beta firmware
Garmin GPSMAP 62s cons
- Small, low resolution screen
- Text entry more difficult than on a touchscreen Oregon
- Relatively heavy (compared to Oregon series)
- Most units seem to sport a creaky case
- Firmware still seems a bit immature
Conclusion and recommendations (updated)
Updated to reflect my testing of production (non-beta) firmware version 2.50.
Recommended. Garmin has nailed the user interface, and the improved performance under the 2.50 firmware has eliminated my previous reluctance about tracklog accuracy. Is it as good as the 60CSx under any and all conditions? Possibly not, but it does show a lot less multipath error when standing still. And it seems to settle down a lot quicker. Those two factors alone could make this a great unit for geocachers.
The 62 series models are some of the best handheld units available today. If you’re sitting on a 60CSx and have been wanting to get a Garmin with new features like BirdsEye aerial imagery, custom maps, advanced track navigation, and paperless caching, it’s probably time to pull the trigger. The performance of the new models is pretty darn close to the 60CSx. You might want to wait for the price to drop a bit, but if you’re holding out for firmware nirvana, I can almost guarantee that when (and if) that day comes, there will be something newer and shinier waiting in the wings, with all the troubles we typically see on new units.
More Garmin GPSMAP 62s reviews
- GPS Information reviews the GPSMAP 62s
- A comparison of the 62s and the older 60CSx
- CacheMania reviews the Garmin 62s
- A New Zealand geocacher has posted a Garmin GPSMAP 62s review
- Free Geography Tools tackles the 62s in a three part review: Parts I, II and III, with conclusions
- A very short 62s review from a marine perspective
- A long distance biker reviews the Garmin 62s
- Using the 62s while sightseeing in Europe
- FellFinder has posted their own Garmin GPSMAP 62s review
- The Wirecutter reviews the GPSMAP 62s
I’ll be posting links to more hands on GPS reviews as they appear, but in the meantime, here are some…
Other Garmin GPSMAP 62s resources
- Trying to decide between the 62 series and the Oregon 450? Maybe this will help.
- The Garmin GPSMAP 62s owners manual
- This chart will show you how the Garmin GPSMAP 62s compares to other Garmin handhelds
- A Garmin GPSMAP 62 and 62 series wiki
- The official Garmin GPSMAP® 62s
web page
Compare prices on the Garmin GPSMAP 62s at these merchants:
- Check the current Garmin GPSMAP 62s
price at Amazon
- Find the Garmin GPSMAP 62s at GPS City, one of our favorite low cost vendors
- Get a great deal on the Garmin GPSMAP 62s 2.6-Inch Handheld GPS Navigator – World Wide
at BuyDig.com
- Check out the deal on the Garmin GPSMAP 62S GPS
at REI.com, where satisfaction is guaranteed and members get 10% back on eligible purchases
- Get the GPSMAP® 62s
direct from Garmin
- Buy the Garmin GPSMAP 62S Rugged High Performance Handheld GPS Receiver
at Tiger GPS













Rich, several of us with 62s and Oregons are just about fed up with their performance regarding total ascent. Those numbers aren’t worth a darn, totally unreliable and inconsistent. You need to change your review these units to reflect this deficiency. Have you been able to do any tests?
Roy
No, and I won’t until my doctor gives me the okay to get back on my mountain bike. I tried it hiking but I need to see too many units at once and keep an eye on them. I’ll be biking with four units on the handlebars.
I doubt that I’ll be able to shed a whole lot of light on anything other than demonstrating unit to unit variability. We know that GPS-derived elevation data is weak, and that barometric-derived data is subject to weather influences and can be worse. It sounds like Garmin is implementing DEM-based corrections and I do hope to get some info straight from the horses mouth on this, but it may be awhile.
I find the automatic waypoint naming HORRIBLE. Has anybody else come to this conclusion?
What I would like is to enter a base name something like:
ACACIA RIDGE RD ###
And then every waypoint from then on would be
ACACIA RIDGE RD 000
ACACIA RIDGE RD 001
and so on.
These base names should also be stored, in case you want to switch between several, like:
ABANDONED CAR ###
ACACIA RIDGE RD ###
GLIDER POSSUM SIGHTING ##
Alfredo
I don’t think Garmin is capable in thinking ahead like that. What a fantastic feature that would be…..To me that is obvious when you enter many waypoints all starting with the same name followed by a unique number. But then I’m only a user out in the field using the GPS daily. What would I know…
BTW, I yet to confirm this, but if you enter the same name and number twice the old GPSmap60csx would add a number one between brackets in the second entry. This new 62sc keeps both names unchanged in the unit. What is the problem…I’ll tell you, try and import both the names into OziExplorer and it won’t do it.Will only accept one. Morale of the story…Don’t enter the same waypoint twice…
Joe
Rookie Question: How do I know if a map I installed on my 62s is there? I used MapInstall to send a Red Pines BWCA/Quetico map to my device, and I am pretty sure it worked, but when I go to the screen where I enable/disable maps, I do not see the name of the map.
What maps are you seeing there? You can connect it to your computer and look at the Garmin folder. If you successfully transferred a map, it should show up there as gmapsupp.img. More info on this here…
http://gpstracklog.com/2011/05/loading-multiple-maps-to-garmin-devices.html
Thanks, Rich. I do not have my device with me (am at work), but I know that when looking on the GPS (not my computer) that I did not see any “Red Pine” maps listed. I will try your suggestion when I get home, and I also appreciate the link you provided.
Mark,
The map file will be an “img” file. When your unit is connected to the pc, you can change the name of the img file to reflect the Red Pine map.
Rich and David-Thanks; I now can see the “Red Pine” map when I enter the Map Information screen!
But now I have another question: I had previously loaded a MN Topo map to my GPS from the GPSFileDepot. Now it is no longer on my GPS. I think I recall reading somewhere that if I add maps that were not factory installed I would lose the non factory installed maps. So, how do I avoid this? How can I have more than one non factory map installed on my GPS without losing any previously loaded non factory ones?
Mark,
Garmin loads maps as an *.img file. It will overwrite the original file with the file you are downloading. So before you download another map, re-name the current img file so you don’t overwrite it.
Correct. Mark, this is covered in the link I gave you…
http://gpstracklog.com/2011/05/loading-multiple-maps-to-garmin-devices.html
Rich and David,
Thanks. I read the article and I understand that I need to re-name the gmapsupp.img in my Garmin folder before I download a different map, which I’ve done, but the first map still seems to vanish.
For example, I cleared all but the preinstalled maps and then reloaded the MN Topo map which I then renamed MNTopo.img. I then loaded the Red Pine map and named that RP.img. WHen I went to the map selection screen on my device, the MN Topo map was no longer listed and the Red Pine map was.
I must be still doing something wrong, but I will eventually get it! I appreciate your input and patience with my inquires.
It may be that the MN maps are there under the RP.img file. When you use MapInstall, it retains previously selected tiles. Check the drop down box and make sure you aren’t sending tiles from two different map sets. Perhaps it’s overwriting the name if you send the same tiles again.
Rich,
When I check the drop down menu, only one of the two maps is selected. That said, the tiles on both maps are highlighted; will this result in your comment that maybe the MN maps are under the RP.img file?
Well, I have just gotten off of the telephone with Garmin and had a very lengthy conversation with the Tech person as well as a supervisor. I told them I have talked to the Garmin Techs on three different occasions and written to them numerous times about the total ascent and decent problem.
Believe it or not, theses two were very surprised with the problem I, we, are having with TA and TD calculation. They said there was no known documentation that anything was wrong. It really blew their mind when I said that the elevation plot page, review track page and BaseCamp were all inconsistent. They did not understand the problem!!!
I told them everything I have been told to do, to correct the problem by Garmin support, as well as the way I have my GPS set up and everything was done correctly they said.
The tech guys said that they really can not do anything for me at this point. The only thing they can do is put in a request to the software engineers to investigate and possibly have the software corrected. They did not know what time frame this could take place. I was told to keep checking for a software upgrade.
I asked if I should send the unit in for service to be checked out or get a new one from REI and they said no, because it sounded like everything else was working correctly.
I ask if they wanted any body else’s name and telephone number to confirm what I have said about having the same problems. They said NO.
They did check to see if they had my correct contact info in case they needed to speak with me again. I don’t know if they were trying to just appease me or not.
They did seem generally concerned, but I find it very hard to believe that other people that are hikers around the world are not having the same issues as this small group and contacting them also.
Hopefully, they will get it fixed, but I am going to try and relax about this issue for now and just try to enjoy my hikes without worrying about Total Ascent and decent. What a pain this has been.
Art,
Here is my incident# from my e-mail contact on 8-22-11KMM22571753I15977L0KM.
Garmin and I have many conversations (phone/e-mails) on this subject. I guess that Garmin has a selective memory. I also told Garmin several times about Rich Owings’ fine work on this website. Garmin explains that they monitor various websites to see what is happening in the market place.
I’ve always requested that the Tech forward my concerns to the “engineers”. So I guess this is all we can do — is to keep Garmin’s feet to the fire.
@Mark – Probably. You would need to go to search the map on the device to see. If you want to be able to enable them independently, I’d get rid of all supplementary maps on the device and start over. Make sure you only have one set of map tiles toggled on when you transfer them. I *think* this will fix it.
Okay, I think I have this figured out! The MN Topo map WAS on the device under the RP.img file. I deleted this, reinstalled the RP map after “unhighlighting” the tiles on the MN Topo map and then did the same with the MN Tpo map and now both are on the device independently.
Thanks so much again for helping a pretty technologically bankrupt guy stuck in a spon cycle on the GPS learning curve! This site is awesome!!
Glad to help. Have fun with it!
At long last (and multiple readings of this review and related comments), I plan to upgrade to the 62s from my faithful 60csx. At one time, I considered the Oregon 450, but I prefer buttons to touchscreen. I also looked into the less expensive etrex 20 and was impressed, but prefer the triaxial compass and the interface similar to the 60csx.
My primary use will be geocaching and I am looking forward to the paperless component. Auto-routing will be a secondary benefit. Based on the above information, could you advise if the following are logical and complementary for purchase?
–GPSr: Garmin GPSMap 62s
–Map (for auto-routing and urban/suburban caching): City Navigator 2012
–Map (for topos): Garmin Birdseye aerial imagery subscription–in hopes that the imagery is decent for Kentucky and surrounding areas
–Screen protector: ZAGG?
Thank you for this site. Though I also glean information from the caching forums, your reviews are so helpful.
Cary,
You can’t go wrong with the Zagg screen protector. It really does work well. I’ve tried the Bird’s Eye topo download. It would be great if your screen was the size of an IPad. Garmin’s 24K Topo is probably the best all around for your purposes as Rich commented.
I’ve also created custom maps. Those are interesting, the resolution is better then the Bird’Eye but not as sharp as purchased maps.
One shortcoming of the free topos that are on the web is that you can’t route on them and they are a huge file size. There are ways to break them up into a smaller size but you need a teenager to figure it out.
Oh congratulations on your purchase of the 62s. I updated my 60csx a while ago. The 62s certainly have a greater functionality then the 60csx.
Dave
Thanks, Dave. Yes, the Garmin 24K topo maps are probably a better choice for my needs. They appear simpler and more consistent to use than going through the reconfiguring process for the free maps.
With the abundance of tree canopy for many hiking areas in Kentucky, the Garmin topos will likely be more beneficial than the BirdsEye aerial shots. If I find a need for BirdsEye, I can always purchase it later, or find the satellite shots for specific outings.
I appreciate your input and am excited about my 62s, screen shield included.
There’s also this… http://gpstracklog.com/2011/05/garmin-birdseye-topo-us-and-canada.html
Oops…I meant to say Birdseye for satellite images. I’m hoping I can get the custom topo maps from gpsfiledepot to supplement the Birdseye aerial shots and City Navigator mapping/turn-by-turn routing.
Yep, sounds like you’ve got a pretty good handle on it.
An alternative to City Navigator, IF you will be sticking to a single region, is to buy Garmin’s new 24K Topo, which will give you City Navigator functionality…
http://gpstracklog.com/2011/06/garmin-topo-us-24k-review.html
I won’t be sticking to a single region, but most of my hikes are in Kentucky. Being a teacher, most of my travel is during June and July, from Canada to Florida. I’ll probably still get the City Navigator for wider scope of travel and the Garmin 24K topo map for the Southeast for regional use.
Would you recommend the DVD formats over the pre-loaded micro-SD cards band downloadables? If so, should I get one 4GB or 8GB micro-SD card, or try to load one of the maps to internal memory?
I have the pre-loaded SD card for Europe and like the flexibility of using it in my 60csx or 62s. However, the lifetime updating for the DVD version of City Navigator may be worthwhile even if locked to one unit. Fortunately, the topos seem to allow for switching even with the DVD format.
Thank you for giving your time to help so many of us who want to enjoy the great outdoors.
*and (not band) downloadables.
And if recommended, the 4GB or 8GB micro-SD cards would be ones I would be using to install the maps from the DVD format, using Basecamp, I assume. I’ve been trying to read up on your advice for installation/renaming of map image files.
Cary,
Get the DVD! The DVD is on your computer, the sd card is not. You can print a map if the map resides on the pc (when the dvd is installed).
The City Navigator will only work with ONE device. You can have it on multiple computers but only one unit. The 24k topos has no restrictions at the moment.
I have an 8gb card. There are some short comings with a large card.
Base Camp likes to limit map size to 4gb. If you have a lot of maps that size enabled on the hand held unit, it will take a half a day to boot up the hand held unit.
What I’ve done, is to divide up the City Navigator in to the east, west and Canada. I didn’t bother to load Mexico. And I only enabled the maps that I need.
But after you download a map segment, you’ll need to access it on your pc and rename it – eg City Navigator East or the pc will overwrite the file with the next download.
If you encounter confusion or a problem, the folks at Garmin are pretty good in solving most problems.
Dave
Definitely buy the DVD from Amazon. I bought the 4 state Southwestern version for $89 and downloaded it to my 4 GIG SD card.
I second (third?) David and Art’s advice about getting the DVD.
I’ll definitely purchase the DVD for City Navigator to cover broader travel and save/rename regions on a microSD card as Dave mentioned.
That leaves the decision to go with either Garmin’s 24k Topo DVD for the Southeast or a Birdseye Topo subscription.
24k Topo DVD for Southeast:
-Logical selection and download process from DVD
-Turn-by-turn routing, a benefit lessened for me by City Navigator
-Not locked to one unit
-May be missing trails for some areas, could be important for longer hikes this summer in other parts of Kentucky or Smoky Mountains
BirdsEye Topo subscription:
-Raster maps appear to be a better match (than vector maps) for positioning on hikes.
-Topo map selection isn’t limited to Southeast states, a consideration if/when I travel north.
-Download process has been hit-and-miss for users, but perhaps most glitches have been resolved?
-Subscription costs less than 24k Topo DVD.
-Limited/locked to one device, not a deal-breaker for me, assuming switching between maps isn’t difficult on 62s after renaming and enabling them as necessary
Your thoughts are appreciated. Thanks to all for the advice!
If it were me and I had City Navigator, I’d skip the 24K maps and go for BirdsEye Topo plus the free 24K topos from http://gpsfiledepot.com.
I ordered my Garmin GPSMAP 62s from GPSCity today (and am already appreciating their customer service) along with a City Navigator DVD, BirdsEye Topo, and a ZAGG screen shield.
I should be good to go when my 62s arrives and plan to use some of the review information for setting up preferred menu format and paperless geocaching. After I install Basecamp, I hope the mapping process is somewhat painless.
Thank you again to all who provided invaluable input!
Congrats Cary,
When you get it set up a MyGarmin account and get the latest unit software update. Yeah, GPSCity is great too.
Thanks for the reminder, Dave. I have a MyGarmin account for my longtime 60csx, but I’ll need to register the new 62s and City Navigator and update to the latest software/firmware. They bundled the 62s with a 4GB microSD card for just $5 more, so I should be able to put some City Navigator regions on it as a start.
Rich,
I just purchased the gpsmap62s. I do lots of hiking in New York’s Adirondack Mountains and for years having been using my old Garmin gpsmap60CS which I purchased in 2006. About the same time, I bought Garmin’s 24K topo map for the National Parks East, which contains the Adirondack Mountains, and used it on the 60cs.
My question: Can I load the old 24K topo map onto the 62s? The answer may be obvious to many out there, but it isn’t to me.
Thanks,
Carl
Carl,
No problem, the topos currently can go on many units unlike City Navigator.
I don’t see any reason why they wouldn’t work on the 62s.
Hi buddy, your helps before has always been excellent. Now, I have a custom POI set, it was not made by me, and im trying to load it to my unit (62st), Ive created a directory on my SD card,
( /Garmin/POI ), the card is in the unit and I have the unit connected. I use the PIO Loader to choose the file i want to load (http://db.tt/qqCnA7qK). It loads up, claims that its uploaded successfully. I restart the unit and try to looks for some of the POI, nothing….
I know exactly where some are and they are not loaded. I zoom in to 80 meters, I have “most detailed view” in map settings. Is there something I have missed? Should I load them up in the unit to? Is there a setting in the unit for the PIOs? Please, any help is very much appreciated.
Update on the last comment:
I can find my poi if I search under “extras”, thats something but I want them to show on the map as i im out walking. Is there and option to do that? ive added a custom image to the pois:http://brillharts.com/GarminAlerts/ and I can se my icon perfectly when I search but not when im zooming or panning the map. Ive also tried the csv with pios without the image. Thank you
Nice webpage. I’m not a POI expert, so you might do better to ask at http://www.poi-factory.com/forum
Thanks!!
Im currently asking around a that site to. Somebody asked is my gps has declutter, wich I dont know what it is and I havnt seen anything about it in the menus. Is there a declutter on / off setting?
Not on the 62s, but under Map Setup > Advanced Map Setup there are some detail options.
the thing that eventually solved the problem was to “restore defaults” on the navigation / map menu. Now it works. And the zoom levels to adjust are “user waypoints” for the custom POIs. Thanks!